Painter v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
President Judge DAN PELLEGRINI.
Walter Painter and Donna Painter, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated (collectively, Customers) petition for review of the order of the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (Commission) adopting the Initial Decision of an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ); dismissing Customers’ exceptions to the Initial Decision; and dismissing Customers’ formal complaint regarding the distribution system improvement charge (DSIC)1 imposed by Aqua Pennsylvania (Aqua), a provider of water and sewage services. We affirm.
In March 2010, Customers filed…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Chester Water Authority v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. PECOSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Lehigh Valley Power Committee v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- United Transportation Union, Pennsylvania State Legislative Board v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Aronson v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.