Legal Opinion

State v. Ruem

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 27, 2013No. 86214-1PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.

¶1 We are asked to determine whether law enforcement officers must expressly advise a person of his or her right to refuse entry into a home — i.e., provide Ferrier1 warnings — when the officers seek to execute an arrest warrant. We hold that Ferrier warnings are not required in this instance, though any consent obtained must be voluntary under the totality of the circumstances.

¶2 On the facts of this case, we conclude that Pierce County sheriff’s deputies unlawfully entered Dara Ruem’s mobile home in an attempt to execute an arrest warrant for Ruem’s brother, Chantha Ruem. The deputies…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Bumper v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Florida v. JimenoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. BuddWashington Supreme Court · 2016
  2. State v. BuddCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  3. State v. McDonnellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2023
  4. State v. WestvangCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  5. State Of Washington v. David Michael KalacCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API