State v. Budd
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWiggins, J.
¶1 The issue before us is whether police officers must give a resident the Ferrier warnings1 before making a warrantless, consent-based entry into the resident’s home in order to seize an item containing suspected contraband. We hold that the Ferrier warnings are required under such circumstances. In this case, the trial court found that the officers did not give Michael Budd the Ferrier warnings before making a warrantless, consent-based entry into Budd’s home to seize his computer. Based on this finding, the Court of Appeals correctly ruled that Budd’s consent was invalid. We therefore…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- State v. HendricksonWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. HendricksonWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. O'NeillWashington Supreme Court · 2003
- In Re the Detention of LaBelleWashington Supreme Court · 1986
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- State of Washington v. Otoniel CarrieroCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
- Rufus Lamont Virgil v. State of ArkansasCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2020
- State of Washington v. Justin Dean VanhollebekeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
- In Re The Detention Of A.f.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2021
- State Of Washington v. Sallyea McclintonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.