State v. Budd
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
¶1
Fearing, J.
Talmadge: Do you remember studying in law school the principle that no matter how humble a man’s cottage is, that even the king of England cannot enter without his consent?
Ehrlichman: I am afraid that has been considerably eroded over the years, has it not?
Talmadge: Down in my country, we still think it is a pretty legitimate principle of law.
Presidential Campaign Activities of 1972: Hearings before the Select Comm, on Presidential Campaign Activities of the U.S. Senate, 93d Cong. 2601 (1973) (exchange between Georgia’s Senator Herman Talmadge and former White House Counsel John…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Arkansas v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- California v. AcevedoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- State v. HendricksonWashington Supreme Court · 1996
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. BuddWashington Supreme Court · 2016
- Jess Ortiz v. Inga SterlingCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
- State Of Washington v. J. Leonor Salazar DimasCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
- State of Washington v. Jeremiah A. Smith aka Glenn A. AkersCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021
- State v. BuddWashington Supreme Court · 2016
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.