Hoja v. Motoc
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWiest, J.
Tom Peterson owned and operated a grocery and meat market. He owed plaintiff $1,000. Without complying with the bulk sales law (2 Comp. Laws 1915, § 6346 et seq.), Peterson sold the stock and fixtures to defendant Motoc for $1,350. Plaintiff, as creditor of Peterson, filed the bill herein to have Motoc declared receiver of the property for the benefit of Peterson’s creditors. Defendant Landry, as trustee in bankruptcy of Peterson, a bankrupt, intervened and asked that Motoc pay him the value of the property for the benefit of the creditors of the bank-, rupt. Motoc claimed that, a few days…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bowen v. QuigleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
- J. L. Hudson Co. v. No-Name Hat Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1913
- Newcomb v. MontagueMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
3Cited by2 opinions
- McPartin v. ClarksonMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
- Patmos v. Grand Rapids Dairy Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1928