Jackson Ex Rel. Jackson v. Collins
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HEDRICK, Judge.
The appellant first assigns as error, based on specific exceptions in the record, the court’s rulings with respect to the admissibility of certain testimony. “In a trial before the judge, sitting without a jury, ‘the ordinary rules as to the competency of evidence applied in a trial before a jury are to some extent relaxed, for the reason that the judge with knowledge of the law is able to eliminate from the testimony he hears that which is immaterial and incompetent, and consider that only which tends properly to prove the facts to be found.’ ” Stansbury, N.C. Evidence 2d, §…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Woodard v. MordecaiSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Carolina Beach Fishing Pier, Inc. v. Town of Carolina BeachSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Taney v. BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- Tanner v. ErvinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
3Cited by8 opinions
- Motor Inn Management, Inc. v. Irvin-Fuller Development Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- Tinkham v. HallCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- Stonewall Insurance v. Fortress Reinsurers Managers, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- Braswell v. PurserCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
- Morris v. MorrisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.