Braswell v. Purser
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BRITT, Judge.
Neither of the numerous assignments of error is based on the introduction of exclusion of evidence. No doubt the lack of exceptions to the evidence is attributable to the fact that appellant Braswell, without prior legal experience, chose to represent himself. There being no assignments of error concerning the introduction or exclusion of evidence brought forward all the evidence is deemed to be competent. The competency of evidence is not presented when there is no objection or exception to its admission and such evidence is properly considered by the court even though the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Cutts v. CaseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- Reid v. JohnstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Kanoy v. HinshawSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Gouldin Ex Rel. Wiley v. Inter-Ocean InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
- Western Conference of Original Free Will Baptists of North Carolina v. CreechSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Peed v. PeedCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- Duke v. Mutual Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
- Livingston v. City of CharlotteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984