Legal Opinion

Tanner v. Ervin

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided July 2, 1959No. 245PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*605PARKER., J.

Defendant has two assignments of error: one to the Judge’s conclusion of law, and the other to the judgment.

All these TJ. S. Savings Bonds contain proper references to the Acts of Congress and to the Circulars and Treasury Regulations under which they are issued, which Regulations are made a part of the bonds by reference.

In the case sub judice four of these bonds, each with a value at maturity of $1,000.00, were issued in February 1942, and four similar bonds were issued in December 1942. Two similar bonds were issued in July 1943, and one similar 'bond in September 1943. One…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Barnette v. WoodySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  2. City of Goldsboro v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  3. Anderson v. BensonDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1953
  4. James v. PretlowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  5. Harrington v. EmmermanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Redevelopment Commission v. Security National Bank of GreensboroSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  2. Williams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  3. Webb v. GaskinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  4. Faires v. McDevitt and Street CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  5. Jackson Ex Rel. Jackson v. CollinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API