Legal Opinion

Tinkham v. Hall

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 15, 1980No. 806DC127PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN (Harry C.), Judge.

In its order of dismissal dated 13 November 1979, the court made findings of fact upon which it based its conclusion of law that attempted service of process upon the defendants Great American Insurance Company, Roy Barnes, and Dan Pittman was insufficient and defective, that the court did not have personal jurisdiction over those defendants, and that plaintiffs complaint failed to state a claim for which relief could be granted against the defendant Elmo Peele. Plaintiff made no exceptions to any of these findings of fact. When findings of fact are not challenged by…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Guthrie v. RaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  2. Hinson v. JeffersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  3. Simms v. MASON'S STORES, INC.(NC-1)Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  4. Stone v. HicksCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  5. Phillips v. AlstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. McAllister v. HaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
  2. State v. DobbinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  3. Harrelson Rubber Co. v. LayneCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  4. TRIAD MOTORSPORTS, LLC. v. Pharbco Marketing Group, Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2000
  5. State v. OverockerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API