Legal Opinion

In Re the Receivership of Port Publishing Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 3, 1950No. 594PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenny, J.

An agreement entered into by and between an employer and its employees, in which it is agreed that the employer will only employ members of a union, or that it will only employ non-union members, is void in this jurisdiction, in so far as it makes union membership or non-union membership a prerequisite to employment. Chapter 328, 1947 Session Laws of North Carolina, G.S. 95-79 to 95-84; S. v. Whitaker, 228 N.C. 352, 45 S.E. 2d 860, which decision was affirmed by the Supreme Court of the United States, and reported in 335 U.S. 525, 93 L. Ed. 301.

A provision in a contract which is against…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Lincoln Federal Labor Union v. Northwestern Iron & Metal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Mellor v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1947
  3. Standard Fashion Co. v. GrantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  4. Division of Labor Law Enforcement v. SampsellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
  5. State v. . WhitakerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Rose v. Vulcan Materials CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  2. Gore v. George J. Ball, IncorporatedSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  3. Local No. 234 of United Ass'n of Journeymen & Apprentices of Plumbing & Pipefitting Industry of United States & Canada v. Henley & Beckwith, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1953
  4. Hudson v. ATLANTIC COAST LINE RAILROAD COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  5. Commodore v. Armour & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1968

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API