Legal Opinion

Cauble v. . Trexler

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 9, 1947PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWinborne, J.

The evidence shown in the record on this appeal, considered in the light most favorable to plaintiff and under applicable principles of law, is sufficient, in our opinion, to take the case to the jury. Hence, appellant’s exception to the judgment from which this appeal comes to this Court is well founded, and is sustained.

It is a general rule of law that agreements against public policy are illegal and void. Burbage v. Windley, 108 N. C., 357, 12 S. E., 839, 12 L. R. A., 409; Phosphate Co. v. Johnson, 188 N. C., 419, 124 S. E., 859.

Agreements are against public policy when they tend clearly,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Cooper v. RheaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1910
  2. Federal Land Bank v. KoslofskyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Courtney v. . ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
  4. Robinson v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
  5. Federal Land Bank v. Blackshear BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Marriott Financial Services, Inc. v. Capitol Funds, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  2. Weyerhaeuser Company v. Carolina Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  3. Gore v. George J. Ball, IncorporatedSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  4. Arthur J. Fulcher, Jr. v. United States of America, Arthur J. Fulcher, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982
  5. In Re the Receivership of Port Publishing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1950

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API