Legal Opinion

Raitport v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided April 13, 1995No. 93-357CPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

MOODY R. TIDWELL, III, Judge:

Plaintiffs in this case seek damages for the alleged infringement by the United States of Eli Raitport’s patents.1 The case is currently before the court on plaintiffs’ motion to recuse Judge Tidwell, defendant’s motion to dismiss ah named plaintiffs except Eh Raitport, and defendant’s motion for summary judgment. For the reasons that follow the court denies plaintiffs’ motion to recuse, and grants defendant’s motion for summary judgment. Defendant’s motion to dismiss ah named plaintiffs except Eh Raitport is dismissed as moot.

FACTS

On September 28, 1971,…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. A.C. Aukerman Company v. R.L. Chaides Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Joy Technologies, Inc. v. Flakt, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1996
  2. Avocent Redmond Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
  3. Stein v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API