Legal Opinion
Joy Technologies, Inc. v. Flakt, Inc.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided March 30, 1996No. Civil Action 89-533-JJFPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
FARNAN, Chief Judge.
The court held a bench trial in this matter on the issue of damages and, at the close of the evidence, the parties were given an opportunity to submit post trial briefing. The Court has considered and weighed the evidence adduced at the damages trial and reviewed the post trial submissions. This Memorandum Opinion shall constitute the Court’s Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law.
I. BACKGROUND
A Procedural History
In 1989, Plaintiff Joy Technology Inc. (“Joy”) sued Flakt Inc. (“Flakt”) for infringement of United States Patent No. 4,279,873, entitled…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. United States Plywood Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1970
- General Motors Corp. v. Devex Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Panduit Corp. v. Stahlin Bros. Fibre Works, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978
- Smithkline Diagnostics, Inc. v. Helena Laboratories Corporation, Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- John A. Bott and Jac Products, Inc. v. Four Star Corporation, a Michigan CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bracco Diagnostics, Inc. v. Amersham Health, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2009
- Boeing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Honeywell International Inc. v. Hamilton Sundstrand Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 2001
- Sociedad Espanola de Electromedicina y Calidad, S.A. v. Blue Ridge X-Ray Co.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2016
- ART + COM Innovationpool GmbH v. Google Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2016
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.