Avocent Redmond Corp. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MARGOLIS, Senior Judge.
The parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment regarding the affirmative defense of laches are before the Court. Oral argument was held in court on May 26, 2010. Because material facts remain in dispute, Avocent Redmond’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of No Laches, filed March 12, 2010, is DENIED; Rose Electronics’ Motion for Summary Judgment Based on Lach-es, filed March 26, 2010, is DENIED; and the United States’ Cross-Motion for Laches, filed April 12, 2010, is DENIED.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
This is a patent infringement action brought under 28 U.S.C. §…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- A.C. Aukerman Company v. R.L. Chaides Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- Crown Operations International, Ltd. And Marshall H. Krone v. Solutia Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Ronald J. Cornetta v. The United States of America and John Lehman, Secretary of the NavyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- David Leinoff v. Louis Milona & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Katzin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Lamson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Giesecke & Devrient Gmbh v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020
- Katzin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- TRAVERS v. FEDEX CORPORATIONDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2021