Legal Opinion

State v. Davis

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 27, 2007No. 95,339PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion was delivered by

Luckert, J.:

Peter J. Davis appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to correct an illegal sentence. We affirm, holding that a motion to correct an illegal sentence does not provide a defendant a means for a collateral attack of a conviction arising after a district court ruled that the State, during trial, could orally amend the date of offense alleged in the complaint.

The amendment at issue was made at the close of the State’s evidence. Originally, Davis was charged with one count of first-degree murder which was alleged to have occurred on January 26,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. NunnSupreme Court of Kansas · 1989
  2. State v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
  3. State v. HogeSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
  4. State v. NashSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
  5. State v. SwitzerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. TrautloffSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
  2. State v. GraceySupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
  3. Phon v. Com. of Ky.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2018
  4. State v. PlotnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 2010
  5. State v. DupreeSupreme Court of Kansas · 2016

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API