Legal Opinion

State v. Nash

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 28, 2006No. 93,575PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

McFarland, C.J.:

Sheldon K. Nash filed a pro se motion to correct an illegal sentence under K.S.A. 22-3504(1). The district court denied relief and defendant appeals therefrom.

BACKGROUND

Defendant’s convictions and sentences were affirmed by this court in his direct appeal in State v. Nash, 261 Kan. 340, 932 P.2d 442 (1997). Defendant and his codefendant, Robert Aildns, were tried together in a joint trial. Aildns’ convictions and sentences were affirmed by this court in his direct appeal in State v. Aikins, 261 Kan. 346, 932 P.2d 408 (1997). The facts…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. AikinsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1997
  2. State v. GaydenSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
  3. State v. GrahamSupreme Court of Kansas · 2004
  4. State v. WalkerSupreme Court of Kansas · 2004
  5. State v. NashSupreme Court of Kansas · 1997

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. State v. TrotterSupreme Court of Kansas · 2013
  2. Phon v. Com. of Ky.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2018
  3. State v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2010
  4. State v. HogeSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
  5. State v. McCarleySupreme Court of Kansas · 2008

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API