Legal Opinion

State v. Hoge

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided February 9, 2007No. 94,774PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion was delivered by

Luckert, J.:

Defendant Joby Hoge appeals the district court’s denial of his pro se motion for correction of an illegal sentence pursuant to K.S.A. 22-3504(1). He argues the district court’s order failed to comply with Kansas Supreme Court Rule 183(j) (2006 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 227), which requires a district court to make findings of fact and conclusions of law on all issues presented in an action filed pursuant to K.S.A. 60-1507. He also contends that the district court committed error by not appointing counsel and conducting a hearing on his motion to correct an…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. BryanSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
  2. State v. DenneySupreme Court of Kansas · 2004
  3. Carmichael v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 1994
  4. Gerhardt v. HarrisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1997
  5. State v. DukeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1997

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. State v. MurraySupreme Court of Kansas · 2008
  2. Fischer v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 2013
  3. State v. NealSupreme Court of Kansas · 2011
  4. State v. SchowSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008
  5. State v. JamesSupreme Court of Kansas · 2019

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API