Eluschuk v. Chemical Engineers Termite Control, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtLillie, J.
Plaintiff sued defendant corporation and Van D. Powell for money arising out of breach of contract and for declaratory relief; the complaint was dismissed as to Powell but defendant corporation answered and filed a counterclaim (defendant did not proceed on the counterclaim). The action was tried on the first and fourth causes of action—in the first, plaintiff sought recovery of $12,000 for services rendered defendant corporation as a termite control salesman between April 23, 1963, and January 31, 1964, and in the fourth a declaration of the rights of the parties under paragraphs 9, 10, 11,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Estate of Bristol v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Berniker v. BernikerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Grant v. the Aerodraulics Co.California Court of Appeal · 1949
- Alexander v. AngelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Julian v. GoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Connie K. HAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MOBIL OIL CORPORATION, a New York Corporation, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Davies MacHinery Co. v. Pine Mountain Club, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1974
- Hunt v. SmythCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Grove v. Grove Valve & Regulator Co.California Court of Appeal · 1970
- Michael Terpin v. at and T Mobility LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.