Legal Opinion

Grove v. Grove Valve & Regulator Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 10, 1970No. Civ. 25668PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

DAVID, J. pro tem. *

This is a suit brought by appellant Marvin H. Grove for injunctive relief and accounting against respondents Grove Valve and Regulator Company and Walworth Company, for use of 12 improvement inventions patented to and allegedly made by him, in the manufacture and sale of the so-called G-5 gate valve, and Valv-Pak completion valve assembly. Respondent companies cross-complained, asserting their ownership of the 12 patents, and 6 more inventions patented to Mr. Grove, by reason of their contract or contracts with appellant Grove; and sought mandatory injunctive relief…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Parsons v. Bristol Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. G. W. Thomas Drayage & Rigging Co.California Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Ward v. TaggartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Panopulos v. MaderisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Crogan v. MetzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Banner Entertainment, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  2. Santandrea v. Siltec Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1976
  3. Siegel v. Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2008
  4. Spitser v. Kentwood Home GuardiansCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  5. BlockFi Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 2023

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API