Legal Opinion
Rauccio v. Frank
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided October 29, 1990No. N-90-161 (WWE)PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS
EGINTON, District Judge.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff, Alphonse Rauccio, commenced this action against Anthony Frank in his official capacity as Postmaster General of the United States Postal Service and against various other Postal Service employees in both their official and individual capacities. Defendants filed a Certification of Scope of Employment and a Notice of Substitution substituting the United States as the proper defendant for purposes of plaintiff’s common law claims. See The Federal Employees Liability Reform and Tort Compensation Act of 1988, § 6,…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Butz v. EconomouSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Stuto v. FleishmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Stuto v. FleishmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Aldridge v. Hartford HospitalDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1996
- Fridman v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- Kobleur v. Group Hospitalization & Medical Services, Inc.District Court, S.D. Georgia · 1991
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.