Legal Opinion
Kobleur v. Group Hospitalization & Medical Services, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Georgia
Decided April 24, 1991No. CV 290-354PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
EDENFIELD, Chief Judge.
The defendant in this case has moved that the Court dismiss this action because the plaintiff has failed to exhaust her administrative remedies. To resolve the motion, the Court must decide whether the Federal Employees Health Benefits Act (“FEHBA” or “the Act”), 5 U.S.C. § 8901 through 8913 (1988) requires a person whose insurer has denied her health benefits claim to seek administrative review of the denial by the Office of Personnel Management (“OPM”) before she challenges the denial in Court. The Court decides that the plaintiff should have pursued her…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
- Weinberger v. SalfiSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- McKart v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Moore v. City of East ClevelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re: Keegan Management Co., Securities Litigation. Michael Moore, and Lieff, Cabraser & Heimann Elizabeth J. Cabraser v. Keegan Management Company, a Delaware Corporation, Michael Moore, and Richard L. Jaeger Feldman, Waldman & Kline v. Keegan Management Company, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Beard v. Lehman Bros. Holdings, Inc.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 2006
- Moore v. Keegan Management Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1994
- Moore v. Keegan Management Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996