Legal Opinion

Stuto v. Fleishman

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided January 21, 1999No. 97-6305PublishedCited by 129 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

164 F.3d 820

Michael J. STUTO, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

Seymour FLEISHMAN, Thomas Pavloski, Kenneth Hamlett, New

York City Office of the United States Department of Labor's

Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, U.S. Department of

Labor, and United States of America, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 97-6305.

United States Court of Appeals,

Second Circuit.

Argued May 13, 1998.

Decided Jan. 21, 1999.

Phillip G. Steck, Cooper, Erving, Savage, Nolan & Heller, LLP, Albany, NY, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Rebecca DeRuyter, U.S. Department of Labor, Office of the Solicitor, Washington, DC (Thomas J. Maroney, United…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by129 opinions

  1. Rothman v. GregorCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
  2. Goldstein v. PatakiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
  3. Conboy v. AT & T Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
  4. Silverman v. Actrade Capital, Inc. (In Re Actrade Financial Technologies Ltd.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2005
  5. Emmons v. City University of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2010

124 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API