Legal Opinion
Fridman v. City of New York
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 28, 2002No. 97 CIV 6099 VMPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
MARRERO, District Judge.
Plaintiff Mikhail Fridman (hereinafter “Fridman”) brought this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, 42 U.S.C. § 1985(c), 42 U.S.C. § 12133, Article 1 §§ 6 and 11 of the Constitution of the State of New York, New York State Civil Rights Law § 40-c, and New York state law regarding medical malpractice, negligence, and breach of contract. The named defendants are the City of New York (hereinafter “City”), HS Systems, Inc. (hereinafter “HSS”), New York City Commissioner of Social Services Marva Livingston Hammons (hereinafter “Hammons”) and Dr. Aurelio Salon…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Fridman v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- Jackson v. JiminoDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2007
- In Re Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether ("MTBE") Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- Carmichael ex rel. Estate of Moore v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2014
- Fridman v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.