Legal Opinion
Etoch v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided January 18, 2001No. 00-573PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ANNABELLE Clinton IMBER, Justice.
Appellant, Louis Etoch, challenges his conviction on two counts of criminal contempt in the Fulton County Circuit Court. Mr. Etoch argues that the evidence was insufficient to convict him of contempt and that the trial court erred by denying him a jury trial.
On May 21, 1999, the Saline County Circuit Court ordered Mr. Etoch to appear and show cause why he should not be held in contempt for his failure to appear for trial in the case of State v. Trett, on April 28, 1999, and in the case of State v. Johnson, on April 29, 1999. Mr. Etoch was counsel for the…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Taylor v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Fitzhugh v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
- Carle v. BurnettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
- Dixon v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
- Yocum v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- McClina v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
- Grady v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
- Perroni v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
- Murchison v. Safeco Ins. Co. of IllinoisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
- State v. HolmesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.