Legal Opinion

State v. Holmes

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 14, 2002No. CR 01-729PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

R AY THORNTON, Justice.

Appellant, State of Arkansas, .brings this appeal, pursuant to Ark. R. App. P.—Crim. 3 (2001), from an order entered by Pulaski County Circuit Court granting a posttrial motion to set aside the verdict in favor of appellee, Eric G. Holmes. On appeal, the State first argues that the trial court erred in granting the posttrial motion because appellant had waived any question pertaining to the sufficiency of the evidence by failing to comply with Ark. R. Crim. P. 33.1(b) (2001), and as a result, was barred from challenging the sufficiency of the evidence supporting his…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Thomas v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  2. Etoch v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Raymond v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  2. Hamm v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
  3. McClina v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  4. T.C. v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2010
  5. Holiday Inn Franchising, Inc. v. Hotel Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2011

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API