Legal Opinion
Perroni v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided June 17, 2004No. 03-878PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Tom Glaze, Justice.
Attorney Samuel A. Perroni appeals tice. Timothy D. Fox’s order finding Perroni in criminal contempt. This matter arises out of a felony tax fraud case that the State filed on July 1, 2000, in the Pulaski County Circuit Court, Sixth Division, against Richard Ross and two other defendants. Perroni represented Ross. Initially, Judge David Bogard was presiding judge, and there were five continuances granted, two of which were because of scheduling conflicts with cases Perroni had pending in different federal district courts.1 Finally, the Ross matter was set first out for a…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Strickler v. GreeneSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- State v. LarimoreSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
- Fitzhugh v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
- Ramaker v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- LegalZoom.com, Inc. v. McIllwainSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2013
- Porter v. Arkansas Department of Health & Human ServicesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
- C.C.B. v. Arkansas Department of Health & Human ServicesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
- Turner v. Northwest Arkansas Neurosurgery Clinic, P.A.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2005
- Sales v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.