Taylor v. Vestal
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
VAN OSDOL, Commissioner.
Plaintiff, Albert E. Taylor, a real estate broker, instituted this action on claims stated in two counts. In Count I, plaintiff sought recovery of $1,500 alleged to he the amount defendants, Leon H. Vestal ■and Louise S. Vestal, had agreed to pay plaintiff as commission for the procurance •of a purchaser of the Vestals’ Party Line Farm in Clay County. It was alleged that plaintiff procured a purchaser, defendant Roberta Johnson, who was ready, willing •and able to purchase the farm on terms satisfactory to the Vestals. In Count II, plaintiff sought recovery of $1,500…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Steele v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1915
- Bell v. KaiserSupreme Court of Missouri · 1872
- Bowman v. RahmoellerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1932
- Barnum v. Hutchens Metal ProductsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1953
- Morgan v. KellerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1906
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Brassfield v. SearsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
- English v. Old American Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
- Leimbach v. NicholsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1959
- Williams v. Kansas City Transit, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1960
- Nichols v. PendleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1960
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.