Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Vestal

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided July 8, 1957No. 45582PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAN OSDOL, Commissioner.

Plaintiff, Albert E. Taylor, a real estate broker, instituted this action on claims stated in two counts. In Count I, plaintiff sought recovery of $1,500 alleged to he the amount defendants, Leon H. Vestal ■and Louise S. Vestal, had agreed to pay plaintiff as commission for the procurance •of a purchaser of the Vestals’ Party Line Farm in Clay County. It was alleged that plaintiff procured a purchaser, defendant Roberta Johnson, who was ready, willing •and able to purchase the farm on terms satisfactory to the Vestals. In Count II, plaintiff sought recovery of $1,500…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Steele v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1915
  2. Bell v. KaiserSupreme Court of Missouri · 1872
  3. Bowman v. RahmoellerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1932
  4. Barnum v. Hutchens Metal ProductsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1953
  5. Morgan v. KellerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1906

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Brassfield v. SearsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
  2. English v. Old American Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
  3. Leimbach v. NicholsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1959
  4. Williams v. Kansas City Transit, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1960
  5. Nichols v. PendleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1960

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API