Legal Opinion

Leimbach v. Nicholson

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 31, 1959No. [No. 114, September Term, 1958.]PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHenderson, J.

In this case the plaintiff, appellee, brought an action in one declaration against two sets of defendants. The claim against Mark E. and Beatrice R. Gann was based on an alleged tortious interference with a contract between Nicholson and the Leimbachs. At the conclusion of the plaintiff’s case the trial court granted the motion of these defendants for a verdict in their favor, and there was no appeal from the judgment entered thereon. The claim against the Leimbachs was for broker’s commissions due upon the sale of the Leimbachs’ farm property. At the conclusion of the whole case, the court…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Keener v. HarrodCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1852
  2. Rosenfield v. WallSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
  3. Attrill v. PattersonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1882
  4. Heslop v. DieudonneCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1971
  5. Steele v. SethCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Damazo v. WahbyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1970
  2. Ricker v. AbramsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1971
  3. Melbourne v. GriffithCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1971
  4. Boyles v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979
  5. Sanders v. DevereuxCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1963

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API