Legal Opinion

Barnum v. Hutchens Metal Products

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided March 9, 1953No. 43092PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

255 S.W.2d 807 (1953)

BARNUM et al.

v.

HUTCHENS METAL PRODUCTS, Inc. et al.

No. 43092.

Supreme Court of Missouri, Division No. 1.

March 9, 1953.

Luther W. Adamson, Kansas City, Richard Farrington, Springfield, for appellants.

J. Weston Miller, John F. Carr and Miller & Fairman, Springfield, for respondents.

VAN OSDOL, Commissioner.

Action by real-estate brokers to recover $9984 commission for the sale and lease of property. Plaintiffs, Howard N. Barnum and Byron F. Jordan, are partners doing business under the firm name of Barnum-Jordan Company, Realtors, with offices in Kansas City; and defendants are…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bell v. KaiserSupreme Court of Missouri · 1872
  2. Harper v. St. Joseph Lead Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1950
  3. Bowman v. RahmoellerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1932
  4. Holmes v. McNeilSupreme Court of Missouri · 1947
  5. Hoock v. SS Kresge Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1950

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Delay Ex Rel. Delay v. WardSupreme Court of Missouri · 1953
  2. State v. HartmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1954
  3. Nichols v. PendleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1960
  4. Taylor v. VestalSupreme Court of Missouri · 1957
  5. E. A. Strout Realty Agency, Inc. v. McKelvyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1968

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API