Legal Opinion

Smoak v. Carpenter Enterprises, Inc.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 24, 1995No. 24284PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Waller, Justice:

This is a breach of contract action in which both sides appealed. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

FACTS

Respondents-Appellants Margaret E. Smoak and Lila S. Easterlin (Sellers) were co-owners of Port City Paper Company (Port City). In 1991, they sold Port City to Carpenter Enterprises, Inc. In conjunction with the sale, Sellers, as a business and individually, agreed not to compete with Carpenter Enterprises for a period of five years. In return, Carpenter Enterprises agreed to make certain monthly payments to each individual Seller during the five-year period. Ronald…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Duke Power Co. v. South Carolina Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
  2. Blumberg v. Nealco, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
  3. Jordan v. Security Group, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
  4. Jennings v. Clearwater Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1934
  5. Orders Distributing Co. v. Newsome Carpets & WallcoveringSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Nova Research, Inc. v. Penske Truck Leasing Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
  2. Laurens Emergency Medical Specialists, PA v. M.S. Bailey & Sons BankersSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
  3. Warren Drilling Co., Inc. v. Ace American Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
  4. First Union National Bank v. FCVS CommunicationsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1996
  5. Laidlaw Environmental Servs., (TOC), Inc. v. Honeywell, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API