Laidlaw Environmental Servs., (TOC), Inc. v. Honeywell, Inc.
District Court, D. South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
TRAXLER, District Judge.
This case presents a study in the battle of the forms between two sophisticated corporate entities that, after thorough negotiations, arrived at a contract for the purchase of a computer control system. After two months of labored negotiation, the parties entered into a contract that provided Plaintiff Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Incorporated, (“Laidlaw”), would purchase a computer control system from Defendant Honeywell, Incorporated (“Honeywell”). Despite this negotiated contract, in which Honeywell’s disclaimer of warranties and limitation of remedies…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Beale v. HardyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
- John C. Donahue v. Windsor Locks Board of Fire Commissioners, John R. Colli, Jr., Russell C. Gabrielson, and John R. Colli, IIICourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Kennedy v. Columbia Lumber & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bahringer v. ADT Security Services, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2013
- Eaton Corp. v. Trane Carolina PlainsDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2004
- Young v. Element Brand Holdings, LLCDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2021