Legal Opinion

Laidlaw Environmental Servs., (TOC), Inc. v. Honeywell, Inc.

District Court, D. South Carolina

Decided September 18, 1996No. C/A 7:95-473-21PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

TRAXLER, District Judge.

This case presents a study in the battle of the forms between two sophisticated corporate entities that, after thorough negotiations, arrived at a contract for the purchase of a computer control system. After two months of labored negotiation, the parties entered into a contract that provided Plaintiff Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Incorporated, (“Laidlaw”), would purchase a computer control system from Defendant Honeywell, Incorporated (“Honeywell”). Despite this negotiated contract, in which Honeywell’s disclaimer of warranties and limitation of remedies…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Beale v. HardyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
  4. John C. Donahue v. Windsor Locks Board of Fire Commissioners, John R. Colli, Jr., Russell C. Gabrielson, and John R. Colli, IIICourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
  5. Kennedy v. Columbia Lumber & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1989

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bahringer v. ADT Security Services, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2013
  2. Eaton Corp. v. Trane Carolina PlainsDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2004
  3. Young v. Element Brand Holdings, LLCDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API