Duke Power Co. v. South Carolina Public Service Commission
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Harwell, Justice:
This is a utility rate case involving the interpretation of a contract between Respondent Greenwood County and Appellant Duke Power Company and the constitutionality of the special enabling legislation. The trial judge held the contract enforceable against Duke and the Act constitutional. We affirm.
Greenwood County owned and operated a hydroelectric facility near Buzzard Roost on the Saluda River from 1940 until 1966. See Taylor v. Davenport, 281 S. C. 497, 316 S. E. (2d) 389 (1984). In 1965, the Greenwood County Electric Power Commission recognized the need to increase its…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Clarke v. South Carolina Public Service AuthoritySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1935
- Duke Power Co. v. Bell, County TreasurerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1930
- Gaud v. WalkerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1949
- Bauer v. South Carolina State Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1978
- Bookhart v. Central Electric Power Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1951
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- Nottingdale Homeowners' Ass'n v. DarbyOhio Supreme Court · 1987
- Whiteside v. Cherokee County School District No. OneSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
- Talley v. South Carolina Higher Education Tuition Grants CommitteeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1986
- Foster v. South Carolina Department of Highways & Public TransportationSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
- Lee v. Chesterfield General Hospital, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.