Washington v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
It is error requiring the grant of a new trial for a trial court simply to overrule, without remedial instructions to the jury, the defendant's objection to the solicitor-general's use of the following language in his concluding argument to the jury: "If a case had not been made out against the defendant, then the court could and would have directed a verdict of not guilty."
DECIDED NOVEMBER 8, 1949.
The error assigned in ground 1 of the amended motion for a new trial is that the court erred in overruling the defendant's objection to the following statement made by the solicitor-general in…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Rawlins v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Brooks v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936
- Southern Railway Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- O'Dell v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Whaley v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Medlock v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1993
- Ex Parte TomlinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
- Ingram v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1958
- Heard v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1953
- Luke v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.