Legal Opinion

Washington v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 8, 1949No. 32479PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

It is error requiring the grant of a new trial for a trial court simply to overrule, without remedial instructions to the jury, the defendant's objection to the solicitor-general's use of the following language in his concluding argument to the jury: "If a case had not been made out against the defendant, then the court could and would have directed a verdict of not guilty."

DECIDED NOVEMBER 8, 1949.

The error assigned in ground 1 of the amended motion for a new trial is that the court erred in overruling the defendant's objection to the following statement made by the solicitor-general in…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Rawlins v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  2. Brooks v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936
  3. Southern Railway Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  4. O'Dell v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  5. Whaley v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Medlock v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1993
  2. Ex Parte TomlinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  3. Ingram v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1958
  4. Heard v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1953
  5. Luke v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API