Legal Opinion

Brooks v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided December 3, 1936No. 11475PublishedCited by 76 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Gilbert, Justice.

The Code, § 81-1009, declares: “Where counsel in the hearing of the jury make statements of prejudicial matters which are not in evidence, it is the duty of the court to interpose and prevent the same; and, on objection made, he shall also rebuke the counsel, and by all needful and proper instructions to the jury endeavor to remove the improper impression from their minds; or, in his discretion, he may order a mistrial if the plaintiff’s attorney is the offender.” That section is not of legislative origin. It has appeared in several of our codes, and the principles…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Mitchum v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1852
  2. Rawlins v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  3. Patton v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  4. Metropolitan Street Railroad v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1892
  5. Georgia Power Co. v. PuckettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1935

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by76 opinions

  1. Joyner v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1951
  2. Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1970
  3. O'NEAL v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2010
  4. Woodham v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1993
  5. Hall v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986

71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API