Legal Opinion

O'Dell v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided May 10, 1904PublishedCited by 55 opinions

Indictment for maintaining policy-lottery. Before Judge Barrow. Motion for new trial overruled by Judge Cann. Chatham superior court. February 3, 1904.

1Opinion of the Court

Cobb, J..

The accused was convicted of operating what is known as a “ policy lottery.” His motion for. a new trial was overruled, and-he excepted.

1. Exception is taken to the following charge: “ A reasonable doubt is not any doubt which may visit the mind of a juror during the investigation of a case and in making up his verdict. A mere passing hesitation of the mind, if it is not of such gravity as to amount to a reasonable doubt, will not justify a juror in finding the defendant not guilty. If the testimony- satisfies him of the guilt of the defendant, beyond a reasonable doubt, he should…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Berry v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1851
  2. Long v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1852
  3. Patton v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  4. Woolfolk v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1889
  5. Walker v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. Elliott v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2019
  2. Rawlins v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  3. Joyner v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1951
  4. Frank v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914
  5. Georgia Power Co. v. PuckettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1935

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API