Ex Parte Tomlin
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
540 So.2d 668 (1988)
Ex parte Phillip Wayne TOMLIN.
(Re Phillip Wayne Tomlin v. State).
85-1110.
Supreme Court of Alabama.
September 23, 1988.
As Corrected on Denial of Third Application for Rehearing December 2, 1988.
Richard G. Alexander of Alexander & Knizley and Winn S.L. Faulk, Mobile, for petitioner.
Don Siegelman, Atty. Gen., and Joseph G.L. Marston III, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.
ON SECOND APPLICATION FOR REHEARING
2Per curiam 1
The petitioner was convicted of murder and was sentenced to death. He complains that improprieties occurred during the trial. During the closing arguments, the prosecutor made…
Also in this document: Dissent; Per curiam 2; Concurrence.
3Cases cited26 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Beck v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Brown v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by35 opinions
- Sockwell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1993
- Harris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1992
- Arthur v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1990
- Hunt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2005
- Ex Parte BryantSupreme Court of Alabama · 2002
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.