Legal Opinion

Oklahoma Coal Co. v. Hays

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 17, 1918No. 8482PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error from District Court, Okmulgee County; Tom D. MeKeown, Assigned Judge. Suit by James M. Hays against the Oklahoma Coal Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtHardy, J.

James M. Hays sued the Oklahoma Coal Company to recover an attorney’s fee under provisions of section 249, Rev. Laws 1910, and recovered a judgment, from which defendant prosecutes error.

Plaintiff alleged that he had -been employed by one James Grayson to commence •an action against defendant to recover an interest in certain real estate, and that suit was commenced therefor, and after the institution of said litigation said Grayson comp’i'iconised and settled .the subject-matter thereof by conveying to defendant his interest therein, and by causing said litigation to be dismissed without…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Noftzger v. MoffettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1901
  2. Crump v. GuyerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. Herman Const. Co. v. WoodSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  4. Culver v. DiamondSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  5. Spaulding v. BeidlemanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. McClintock v. ParishSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  2. Bilby v. GibsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  3. Orwig v. EmerickSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  4. McDougal v. Black Panther Oil & Gas Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1921
  5. Chowning v. LedbetterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API