Legal Opinion
Orwig v. Emerick
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided October 14, 1924No. 14436PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGordon, J.
On the 15th day of January, 1S20, a contract was entered into between J. D. Emerick, an attorney at law, of We-W'oka, Okla., of the one part, and Primus Dean and Ruthie Dean, his wife, of the other part, by the terms of which Primus Dean and Ruthie Dean employed J. L. Emerick to file suit to recover certain lands in Seminole county, Okla., and in said contract it was agreed that said Emerick should receive as a contingent fee an undivided one-half interest in said lands or in so much as might be recovered, together with one-half of all rents that should be recovered in the suit for that…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Weeks v. MerkleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1898
- Herman Const. Co. v. WoodSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Wilson v. WoodSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1900
- Taylor v. AndersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Chowning v. LedbetterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Simpson v. BakerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Callahan v. Cowley RiddleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Sterling Milk Products Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
- Mathews v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Sterling Milk Products Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.