Legal Opinion

Crump v. Guyer

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 29, 1916No. 6460PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Error from District Court, Garvin County; R. McMillan, Judge. Action by John R. Guyer and another against W. B. Crump. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

BRETT, C.

This action was-brought to recover on an attorney’s lien. The-material facts are that one Irene Stewart inherited a tract of real estate from her mother. She was a minor. On December 28,, 1908, she married, and the law of 1897 (Laws 1S97, c. 8, sec. 1), which is section S77, Wilson’s Revised & Annotated Statutes of 1903,. provided that:

“All male persons of the age of twenty-one years, and all females of the age of eighteen years, and all persons who have been legally married of whatever age, and all corporations to the extent authorized by law, may take title to, hold,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Society for the Propagation of the Gospel v. WheelerU.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Hampshire · 1814
  2. Rigney v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1881
  3. People v. . HavnorNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  4. State v. JulowSupreme Court of Missouri · 1895
  5. Good v. KeelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Starkey v. Oklahoma Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2013
  2. Ricks Exploration Co. v. Oklahoma Water Resources BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
  3. Oklahoma Water Resources Board v. Central Oklahoma Master Conservancy DistrictSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969
  4. Baker v. Tulsa Bldg. & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  5. Wylie v. City Commission of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1940

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API