Legal Opinion

State v. Walsh

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 8, 2001No. 68979-2PublishedCited by 128 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMadsen, J.

The defendant agreed to plead guilty to second degree rape in exchange for the prosecutor’s promise to recommend a sentence at the low end of the standard *4range. However, the parties were mistaken about the proper standard range sentence—the standard range is higher than contemplated by the plea agreement. We hold that the plea agreement was not voluntary and that the defendant is entitled to challenge the plea’s validity for the first time on appeal.

Facts

Defendant Timothy Walsh was originally charged with first degree kidnapping, first degree rape, and second degree assault. He agreed to a…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. State v. McFarlandWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  5. State v. ScottWashington Supreme Court · 1988

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by128 opinions

  1. State v. KirkmanWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  2. State v. KirkmanWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State v. O'HaraWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  4. In re the Personal Restraint of GoodwinWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  5. In re the Personal Restraint of IsadoreWashington Supreme Court · 2004

123 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API