In re the Personal Restraint of Hinton
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMadsen, J.
Each of the petitioners’ convictions in these consolidated cases must be vacated in light of In re Personal Restraint of Andress, 147 Wn.2d 602, 56 P.3d 981 (2002). While the facts of each petitioner’s conduct are immaterial to the legal questions we address in this opinion, we are aware that some of these cases involve horrifying conduct, and all involve heartbreaking loss of life. The cost in terms of human anguish is immeasurable. Judges are not immune to these horrors. Yet, to assure lawful and fair treatment of all persons convicted under a statute that did not criminalize their acts as…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Bousley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Collins v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by106 opinions
- In re the Personal Restraint of CoatsWashington Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. PillatosWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. PillatosWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- In Re HintonWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. GambleWashington Supreme Court · 2010
101 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.