Legal Opinion
Hendrix v. Pique
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided December 22, 1938No. 1 Div. 12PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FOSTER, Justice.
This is a suit at law for a sum of money alleged to be owing plaintiff by virtue of a contract made by defendant’s testate represented ■ by a letter alleged to have been signed by him and given to plaintiff. The letter is as follows:
“You have been so very nice to me during the past several years — writing all of my letters and telegrams for me and mailing them, even furnishing the postage, that I want to do something for you. You-refuse every time to let me pay you for your trouble. What I am getting at is, I do not want you to do my work for me unless I can reimburse you for…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
- Taylor v. KellySupreme Court of Alabama · 1857
- Manning v. PippenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888
- Bolman v. OverallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1886
- Westmoreland & Trousdale v. FosterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1877
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Cowin v. SalmonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
- Merchants Nat. Bank of Mobile v. CotnamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
- Pangarova v. NicholsWyoming Supreme Court · 1966
- Wagar v. MarshburnSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
- Rainey v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1943
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.