Legal Opinion

Pangarova v. Nichols

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided November 2, 1966No. 3465PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gray

Plaintiff commenced an action against the defendant as executrix of the estate of Nick A. Nichols, deceased, to recover damages for a breach of contract purportedly made by deceased in his lifetime to adopt plaintiff and make her his heir. The case was tried with a jury present, and at the conclusion of the plaintiff’s evidence the trial court sustained the motion of the defendant for a directed verdict and entered judgment accordingly. From the judgment plaintiff appeals.

The action taken by the trial court is to be viewed under the prevailing rule that the evidence offered by plaintiff will…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Bland v. MentorWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Canada v. IhmsenWyoming Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Savannah Bank & Trust Co. v. WolffSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
  4. Casper Nationak Bank v. CurryWyoming Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. ArmstrongCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1936

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Mountain Fuel Supply, a Utah Corporation, and Cna Insurance Company v. Reliance Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
  2. Texas Gulf Sulphur Company v. RoblesWyoming Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Arbenz Ex Rel. Seipt v. DeboutWyoming Supreme Court · 1968
  4. In Re HardisonWyoming Supreme Court · 1967
  5. In Re Estate of SeaderWyoming Supreme Court · 2003

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API