Legal Opinion

Wagar v. Marshburn

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 27, 1941No. 1 Div. 128PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, Justice.

The chief question in this case is dependent upon the interpretation and effect of a written instrument dated September 11, 1919, executed by Fred L. Wagar and his two children, Portia W. Wagar (now Marshburn), and H. R.. Wagar, Jr., which instrument is as follows:

“2819 P St., N. W.,
“Washington, D. C.
“September 11, 1919.
“I, F. L. Wagar, do not claim any interest in the estate of Nanta W. Wagar, and any claims I could have in law or equity or otherwise are hereby relinquished and set over and assigned to H. R. Wagar, Jr., and Portia W. Wagar, equally. I, F. L. Wagar, also…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  2. Eaton v. EatonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
  3. Manning v. PippenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888
  4. Bolman v. OverallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1886
  5. Bruce v. MoonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1900

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Cowin v. SalmonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
  2. Estate of Draper v. Bank of America, N.A.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2009
  3. In Re Estate of LendersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1956
  4. Estate of Vermilya v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1963
  5. Humphries v. WhiteleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1990

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API