Rainey v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
SIMPSON, Judge.
The case was tried without a jury.
The appeal is from a conviction of driving a motor vehicle upon a highway of this State while intoxicated. Code 1940, Title 36, Sec. 2.
While the defendant’s guilt was not abundantly sustained by the evidence adduced, we do think, and hold, that the proof was sufficient to support the lower court’s conclusion on this issue.
The cause must be reversed, however, for the admission of illegal evidence.
The evidence was not without conflicting inferences, and the rule is that the admission of illegal evidence raises the presumption of injury,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- First National Bank v. ChaffinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1897
- Holley v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1932
- Phillips v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1932
- Hendrix v. PiqueSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
- McMurry v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1938
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. DavisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1972
- Boyd v. City of MontgomeryCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1985
- Moates v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1959
- Ayers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1972
- Gamble v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1952
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.