Legal Opinion

Cowin v. Salmon

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 11, 1943No. 6 Div. 36PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, Justice.

Salmon and Cowin had been associated in business for a number of years. It was incorporated as Salmon & Cowin, Inc., Mining Engineers and Contractors, to which we will refer as the Salmon Company, since this was done in the pleadings. Each originally owned separately an equal number of shares.

More recently another corporation was formed known -as Mine & Contractors Supply Company, to which we will refer as the Supply Company.

Salmon and Cowin were mining engineers, engaged principally in mine development, such as shaft sinking, also slopes and tunnels. A part of their business…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  2. Manning v. PippenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888
  3. Stewart v. ToddSupreme Court of Iowa · 1919
  4. McIntyre Lumber & Export Co. v. Jackson Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1910
  5. Canada v. IhmsenWyoming Supreme Court · 1925

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Clanton v. Bains Oil Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1982
  2. McMillan, Ltd. v. WARRIOR DRILLING & ENG.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  3. Hammond v. BinghamIdaho Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Bankers & Shippers Ins. Co. of NY v. BlackwellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
  5. Merchants Nat. Bank of Mobile v. CotnamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API