Legal Opinion
Anthony Augliera, Inc. v. Loughlin
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided May 8, 1962PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBaldwin, C. J.
The plaintiffs, Anthony Augliera, Inc., Boy Hurlburt, and the Nygard Express Company, are motor contract carriers operating under certificates issued by the public utilities commission. See General Statutes ^ 16-281 (d), 16-292. The plaintiffs have appealed from a judgment of the Superior Court which dismissed their appeal from an order of the commission of June 9, 1960, raising their rates on the carriage of iron and steel articles to the level of the rates for those articles applicable to motor common carriers under a rate stabilization order of the commission, Docket No. 9652, dated April…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Rochester Telephone Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. City of Jersey CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Hennessey v. HennesseySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
- Betterman v. American Stores Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- Steele v. General Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Samperi v. Inland Wetlands AgencySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Red Hill Coalition, Inc. v. Conservation CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- City of New Haven v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
- Connecticut Television, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1970
- Lovejoy v. Water Resources CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.