Legal Opinion

Lovejoy v. Water Resources Commission

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided June 29, 1973PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBogdanski, J.

In this action, the plaintiff, Frederick F. Lovejoy, appealed to the Superior Court1 from the action of the defendant water resources commission, hereinafter called the commission,2 in *226granting to Willem and WiHielmina vanEmmenes, hereinafter called the defendants, a permit for the construction of a float and pile pier formation attached to an existing pile and timber pier located in Sheffield Harbor at Wilson Point, in the city of Nor-walk, Connecticut. In addition to the record before the commission, the trial court took evidence with respect to the plaintiff’s claims. It found the issues…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Jaffe v. State Department of HealthSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1949
  2. Brauer v. FrecciaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1970
  3. Connecticut Television, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1970
  4. Hotchkiss Grove Ass'n v. Water Resources CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
  5. Gentile v. IvesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1970

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Mystic Marinelife Aquarium, Inc. v. GillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
  2. Samperi v. Inland Wetlands AgencySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  3. Red Hill Coalition, Inc. v. Conservation CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  4. Leib v. Board of Examiners for NursingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
  5. Madrid Corp. v. Inland Wetlands AgencyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API