Legal Opinion
Cubic Defense Systems, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided September 23, 1999No. 99-483CPublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BUSH, Judge.
The present action brought by plaintiff, Cubic Defense Systems (Cubic), stems from a decision by the United States Air Force (USAF or Air Force) to procure Contractor Logistics Support (CLS) services at Prince Sultan Air Base from a single source, Metric Systems Corporation (Metric), the defendant-intervenor in this matter. Cubic moves for summary judgment based on the administrative record and asserts that the Government’s decision to award this contract without competition violates the Competition in Contracting Act (CICA). Additionally, Cubic seeks injunctive relief to…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- A & D Fire Protection, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Minehan v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- Cubic Defense Systems, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
- Magnum Opus Technologies, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Allied Technology Group, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.