Legal Opinion
Magnum Opus Technologies, Inc. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided May 28, 2010No. Nos. 10-106C, 10-127CPublishedCited by 72 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER *
GEORGE W. MILLER, Judge.
These consolidated bid protests arise out of the United States Air Force’s (“Air Force’s”) exercise of options on four of six indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity (“ID/IQ”) contracts to supply health care service providers. Plaintiffs Magnum Opus Technologies, Inc. (“Magnum Opus”) and The Healing Staff, Inc. (“Healing Staff’) held the two ID/IQ contracts for which the Air Force chose not to exercise the options. Plaintiffs contend that the exercise of the options of the other four awardees violated the Competition in Contracting Act (“CICA”) and…
2Cases cited79 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Summers v. Earth Island InstituteSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by72 opinions
- Linc Government Services, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Bayfirst Solutions, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- HP Enterprise Services, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Furniture By Thurston v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Management & Training Corporation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.